For many factories and industrial buyers, the first question when sourcing internationally is simple: What is the duty rate? But experienced procurement leaders know that the real story begins much earlier, at the level of trade agreements, preferential frameworks, and long-term policy direction. Understanding how free trade agreements shape TÜRKİYE–U.S. trade relations is not an academic exercise; it directly affects sourcing flexibility, cost predictability, and strategic planning.
This is precisely why manufacturers working with MT Royal often gain an edge. MT Royal does not view trade policy as distant politics, but as a practical layer of the supply chain that influences which products move smoothly, which face friction, and which offer sustainable advantages over time. When you understand how free trade agreements, customs frameworks, and preferential access interact between Türkiye and the United States, you stop reacting to trade rules and start designing around them.
This article is written for factory owners, purchasing managers, and supply chain decision-makers who want a clear, realistic, and actionable understanding of free trade agreements and their role in TÜRKİYE–U.S. trade relations.
What Are Free Trade Agreements and Why They Matter in Industrial Trade
Defining Free Trade Agreements in Practical Terms
Free Trade Agreements, commonly known as FTAs, are treaties between two or more countries designed to reduce or eliminate barriers to trade. These barriers include customs duties, quotas, licensing requirements, and certain regulatory obstacles.
For manufacturers, the value of an FTA lies in three core outcomes:
- Lower or zero import duties
- Clear and predictable trade rules
- Reduced administrative friction
An FTA does not eliminate all compliance obligations, but it reshapes the cost and risk profile of cross-border sourcing.
FTAs as Supply Chain Infrastructure
In modern manufacturing, FTAs function like invisible infrastructure. You do not see them on the production floor, but they determine how reliably inputs arrive, how stable landed costs remain, and how resilient sourcing strategies are during market disruptions.
The Current State of TÜRKİYE–U.S. Trade Relations
No Bilateral Free Trade Agreement—Yet
Unlike many U.S. trading partners, Türkiye does not currently have a comprehensive bilateral free trade agreement with the United States. This single fact defines much of the current trade environment.
Without an FTA, most Turkish-origin goods enter the U.S. under standard Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) tariff rates as defined in the U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTSUS). For some products, these rates are low or zero. For others, they can be commercially significant.
Understanding this baseline is essential before discussing benefits, limitations, and future opportunities.
Strong Trade Despite the Absence of an FTA
Despite the lack of a formal FTA, trade between Türkiye and the U.S. remains robust. Türkiye exports a wide range of goods to the U.S., including:
- Food ingredients and agricultural derivatives
- Chemicals and industrial intermediates
- Metals and engineered components
- Consumer and industrial textiles
This highlights an important truth: FTAs enhance trade, but they are not the sole driver of it.
Preferential Trade Mechanisms That Still Matter
The Role of MFN Status
Türkiye benefits from MFN treatment under World Trade Organization rules. This means Turkish exports to the U.S. are not subject to discriminatory tariffs and generally receive the same treatment as goods from most other WTO members.
For manufacturers, MFN status provides baseline predictability, even without preferential reductions.
Sector-Specific Advantages
Certain Turkish products benefit from globally low tariff rates due to their classification rather than their origin. For example, many industrial raw materials and intermediate goods enter the U.S. duty-free regardless of country of origin.
This is why experienced sourcing partners focus not only on FTAs, but on classification strategy, product composition, and end-use declarations.
How Free Trade Agreements Would Benefit TÜRKİYE–U.S. Trade
Lower Duties and Improved Cost Competitiveness
The most obvious benefit of a future TÜRKİYE–U.S. FTA would be duty reduction or elimination. For manufacturers importing high-volume inputs, even small duty reductions can translate into substantial annual savings.
Lower duties also:
- Improve pricing stability
- Increase supplier competitiveness
- Reduce pressure on procurement margins
Simplified Rules of Origin
FTAs introduce structured rules of origin that clarify when a product qualifies for preferential treatment. While these rules require documentation, they also provide certainty.
For factories sourcing from Türkiye, clear origin rules would reduce ambiguity around multi-country inputs and processing stages.
Greater Supply Chain Resilience
An FTA encourages long-term supplier relationships by reducing trade friction. This stability is especially valuable in periods of global disruption, when manufacturers seek alternatives to overconcentrated sourcing regions.
We have seen companies reassess their geographic sourcing precisely because predictable trade frameworks reduce operational stress.
Common Misconceptions About FTAs in Industrial Sourcing
“No FTA Means No Opportunity”
This is one of the most persistent myths. Many manufacturers successfully source from Türkiye today, even without an FTA, by focusing on:
- Correct HS classification
- Product categories with low or zero MFN duties
- Strategic supplier selection
An FTA enhances opportunity; it does not create it from nothing.
“FTAs Automatically Eliminate All Duties”
Even under FTAs, not all products become duty-free. Sensitive sectors may retain duties, quotas, or safeguard mechanisms. Understanding exclusions is as important as understanding benefits.
“FTAs Remove Compliance Responsibilities”
Preferential trade increases documentation requirements. Certificates of origin, supplier declarations, and audit readiness become even more important under FTAs.
Strategic Considerations for Manufacturers Today
Designing Sourcing Strategies Without Waiting for Policy Changes
While discussions about deeper TÜRKİYE–U.S. trade cooperation continue, manufacturers cannot afford to wait passively. The most successful procurement teams build strategies that work under current rules while remaining flexible for future changes.
At MT Royal, we have seen factories succeed by aligning sourcing decisions with existing tariff structures rather than hypothetical future agreements.
Using Trade Knowledge as a Negotiation Tool
Understanding trade frameworks allows buyers to negotiate more effectively with suppliers. When both parties understand duty exposure and compliance costs, pricing discussions become grounded in reality rather than assumptions.
This is where experienced partners add value beyond transactional sourcing.
Comparing Türkiye to FTA Partner Countries
Cost vs. Complexity Trade-Offs
FTA partner countries may offer lower duties, but they may also come with higher production costs, longer lead times, or less flexible manufacturing capacity.
Türkiye often competes on:
- Shorter lead times to the U.S. compared to Asia
- Flexible production volumes
- Strong quality control in industrial and food sectors
The absence of an FTA does not negate these advantages.
Risk Diversification in a Multi-Origin Strategy
Many manufacturers adopt a blended sourcing approach, combining FTA and non-FTA origins. Türkiye often plays a key role in this model, offering balance between cost, quality, and reliability.
Frequently Asked Questions from Factory and Procurement Leaders
Does Türkiye Have Any Special Trade Status with the U.S.?
Türkiye trades with the U.S. under WTO MFN rules. It does not currently benefit from a bilateral FTA or generalized preference program.
Would an FTA Eliminate All Customs Duties?
No. FTAs typically phase out duties over time and may exclude sensitive product categories.
Is It Risky to Rely on Non-FTA Suppliers?
Not inherently. Risk depends on classification accuracy, compliance discipline, and supply chain design, not solely on FTA status.
How Should Factories Prepare for Possible Future Agreements?
By documenting origin, standardizing specifications, and maintaining transparent supplier relationships, factories position themselves to adapt quickly if new agreements emerge.
The MT Royal View
At MT Royal, we have learned that trade agreements matter most when they are translated into operational decisions. We have worked with factories that assumed the lack of an FTA made Turkish sourcing unattractive, only to discover that their actual duty exposure was minimal once classification and product structure were optimized.
We have also seen how long-term thinking transforms sourcing. Instead of chasing the lowest nominal duty rate, successful manufacturers focus on stability, compliance confidence, and supplier reliability.
We believe that understanding free trade agreements—and their limits—is part of modern industrial literacy.
A Perspective That Endures Beyond Policy Headlines
Trade agreements will continue to evolve, shaped by politics, economics, and global realignment. What does not change is the need for manufacturers to make informed decisions based on current realities rather than speculation.
For factories sourcing from Türkiye, the absence of a U.S. free trade agreement is not a dead end. It is a context—one that rewards preparation, technical understanding, and strategic partnerships. When you understand how FTAs work, what they offer, and where they fall short, you gain something more valuable than duty savings: control.
No comment